Home > geospatial > Google Maps versus Open Street Map in New Zealand

Google Maps versus Open Street Map in New Zealand

December 27, 2010 Leave a comment Go to comments

I’ve always been a big fan of Google Maps. It and its cousin Google Earth have basically made the street directory and atlas obsolete, and they’re great tools for armchair tourism. Every now and again they update their imagery, adding clearer and more detailed aerial photography, and occasionally they change the maps themselves, adding new roads and deleting old ones.

A few weeks ago, Google Maps updated their map data for my city – Christchurch, New Zealand. Rather than being an improvement, however, things have gone a bit… mental.

In Google’s world, Riccarton Ave now circles Christchurch Hospital. The open-source Open Street Map is much closer to reality, clearly showing a set of no-thoroughfare service roads and parking aisles, with no way of getting from Riccarton Ave to the other side of the river.

Google also has made the Heathcote River evaporate, and has added roads winding through Christchurch City Council’s disused Pipe Yards:

And, perhaps most bizarrely, they’ve put some traffic lights in the Botanic Gardens:

Yep, those are gravel paths for pedestrians… These changes are so random it makes you wonder about the reliability of the rest of their map data.

You’ll notice that in the images above I’ve used Open Street Map as the standard against which I’m judging the Google maps. OSM is sort of like the Wikipedia of maps, and though its quality varies from country to country, its New Zealand maps are fantastic. Most of the work has thus far been done by hand, but a few years back the New Zealand Government licensed LINZ’s data for use in Open Street Map, meaning further improvements to things like coastlines, and remote islands. The maps are constantly enhanced and updated by a band of volunteer mappers, meaning it responds to changes incredibly quickly and is obviously much more useful for navigation (with apps like MotionX GPS). By comparison, there are whole subdivisions missing from Google’s Christchurch map, even though it’s a recent update.

Globally, OSM is quickly surpassing Google Maps in terms of both the quality and quantity of information. The Germans are well onto it – check out Berlin!

And it’s not just aesthetics – the rapid mapping by OSM volunteers saved lives following the Haiti earthquake (watch Tim Berners-Lee’s TED talk if you haven’t already).

Go on – try Open Street Map. It’s probably more accurate than Google Maps, and if your local area isn’t, make some edits to improve it!

  1. December 31, 2010 at 11:32 am

    My Wife and I had our honeymoon in New Zealand in 2006 – spending 3 weeks circumnavigating the North and South Islands. I had my trusty Garmin 60CSx on the dash of our car the entire trip and captured the first pass at a number of the New Zealand highways and augmenting some of the cities and villages.

    It’s awesome to see OSM adopted so thoroughly through New Zealand and provide quality, open data. I can’t want to come back and use OSM as our primary navigation tool.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: